Commonwealth v. Morton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the trial court did not violate the prior version of Rule 646 where, during deliberations, the jury was placed in the jury box, permitted to review a written confession briefly, not permitted to deliberate while in the jury box, and given a cautionary instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Mitchell
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-07-19· cited 186×
• Commonwealth v. Strong
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-11-25· cited 28×