Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Terry

Citations

  • 462 A.2d 676
  • 501 Pa. 626
  • 1983 Pa. LEXIS 637

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the contention that a violation of former Pa.R.Crim.P. 1114, renumbered Pa.R.Crim.P. 646, can be harmless error
  • “Since [the defendant’s] only defense was his subjective mental condition we conclude the availability of a police edited statement emphasizing the criminal act and its conscious planning, but omitting [the defendant’s] arguably delusional statements, was prejudicial to him.”
  • “Since [the defendant’s] only defense was his subjective mental condition we conclude the availability of a police edited statement emphasizing the criminal act and its conscious planning, but omitting [the defendant’s] arguably delusional statements, was prejudicial to him.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roberts, C.J., and Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Hutchinson and Zappala

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.