Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 3/5/2015
Commonwealth v. Ali
Citations
- 112 A.3d 1210
- 2015 Pa. Super. 45
- 2015 Pa. Super. LEXIS 99
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “enhancements only direct a sentencing court to consider a different range of potential minimum sentences, while preserving a trial court’s discretion to fashion an individual sentence.”
- addressing a youth enhancement and finding “offender” to mean the primary actor of the crime, not an accomplice
- stating sentence enhancements do not bind court to impose particular sentence or compel court to sentence within specified guideline range; guidelines are advisory only, even though they contain word “shall”; enhanced guidelines do not fall under Alleyne holding
- “[A]s section 9738 makes clear, before victim impact statements may be admitted at a sentencing hearing, there first must be an identifiable victim of the crime for which the defendant was convicted.”
- “[A]s section 9738 makes clear, before victim impact statements may be admitted at a sentencing hearing, there first must be an identifiable victim of the crime for which the defendant was convicted.”
- “By their very character, sentencing enhancements do not share the attributes of a mandatory minimum sentence that the Supreme Court held to be elements of the offense that must be submitted to a jury.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Donohue, Wecht, Platt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Com. of Pa. v. KingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-03-19· cited 68×
- Commonwealth v. AliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-10-09· cited 63×
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Ali, R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-11-22· cited 36×
- 2303 Bainbridge, LLC. v. Steel River Bldg SystemsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-09-03· cited 9×
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2013-06-17· cited 5,868×
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 3,458×
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 1,506×
- Commonwealth v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-09-26· cited 1,088×
- Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-01-26· cited 730×
- Commonwealth v. GriffinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-06-24· cited 420×
- Commonwealth v. WatleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-11-25· cited 414×
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-08-21· cited 299×
- Commonwealth v. RhoadesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-11-12· cited 279×
- Commonwealth v. FlorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-07-22· cited 148×
- Commonwealth v. BOROVICHKASuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-04-27· cited 138×
- Commonwealth v. LawrenceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-08-27· cited 136×
- Commonwealth v. WeakleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-04-17· cited 131×
- Commonwealth v. AkbarSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-04-30· cited 131×
- Commonwealth v. BetheaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-10-28· cited 119×
- Commonwealth v. DupreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-01-11· cited 105×
- Commonwealth v. PuksarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-11-01· cited 98×
- Commonwealth v. RiveraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-07-03· cited 89×
- Commonwealth v. DrummondSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-04-25· cited 82×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.