Skip to main content
· 1/31/1990

Commonwealth v. Oleynik

Citations

  • 568 A.2d 1238
  • 524 Pa. 41
  • 1990 Pa. LEXIS 25

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding “that the possible prejudice to a defendant from written instructions to a jury outweighs any benefit such instructions might provide”
  • condemning written jury instructions defining legal causation, third-degree murder, and involuntary manslaughter
  • condemning written jury instructions defining legal causation, third-degree murder, and involuntary manslaughter
  • “[T]he submission of written instructions would tend to encourage the jury to ignore the court’s general instruction and focus upon the written instructions supplied to them.”
  • \[T]he submission of written instructions would tend to encourage the jury to ignore the court's general instruction and focus upon the written instructions supplied to them.\
  • possible prejudice to a defendant from giving written instructions to a jury outweighs any benefit that such instructions might provide

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Zappala, Papadakos, Cappy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.