Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Barnett

Citations

  • 50 A.3d 176
  • 2012 Pa. Super. 157
  • 2012 WL 3089350
  • 2012 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1600

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • pointing out that where a “written statement … is not specifically prohibited by Pa.R.Crim.P. 646(C), … publication to the jury falls squarely within the discretion of the trial court and, thus, the decision cannot be overturned absent an abuse of discretion”
  • “Whether an exhibit should be allowed to go out with the jury during its deliberation is within the sound discretion of the trial judge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bender, Lazarus, Strassburger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.