Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 7/20/1998

Commonwealth v. Spotz

Citations

716 A.2d 580
552 Pa. 499
1998 Pa. LEXIS 1425

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the failure to develop an issue in an appellate brief results in waiver
holding that the failure to develop issue in appellate brief results in waiver under Pa. R.A.P. 2119(a)
Holding that a jury is free to disbelieve evidence proffered - 12 - J-A09009-15 by Appellant that he was not the trigger person
holding that the failure to develop an issue in appellate brief results in waiver under Pa. R.A.P. 2119(a)
holding that “a specific intent to kill may be proven by circumstantial evidence, and therefore, may be inferred from the defendant’s use of a deadly weapon upon a vital part of the victim’s body”
holding that failure to develop an issue in an appellate brief results in waiver

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

76 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.