Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 8/22/2000

Commonwealth v. Spotz

Citations

756 A.2d 1139
562 Pa. 498
2000 Pa. LEXIS 2039

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that there is no Brady violation where the prosecutor fails to turn over evidence readily obtainable by, and known to, the defendant
noting that there is no Brady violation where the prosecutor fails to turn over evidence readily obtainable by, and known to, the defendant
stating that there is no Brady violation where the prosecutor failed to turn over evidence readily obtainable by, and known to, defendant
stating that there is no Brady violation where the prosecutor failed to turn over evidence readily obtainable by, and known to, defendant
noting that satisfaction of the “substantial reason” burden under the precursor rule to Rule 121(C
holding expert testimony was properly rendered to a reasonable degree of medical certainty although the doctor did not use the \magic words\ where the doctor explained the medical basis for all of his conclusions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaherty, Zarpala, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor, Zappala

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.