Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 5/2/2006

Commonwealth v. Spotz

Citations

896 A.2d 1191
587 Pa. 1
2006 Pa. LEXIS 659

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that Appellant was not prejudiced in one of his other trials by the failure of counsel to present merely cumulative evidence
holding that Appellant was not prejudiced in one of his other trials by the failure of counsel to present merely cumulative evidence
holding that, in evaluating a Batson claim alleging gender discrimination, a court may look to whether the prosecutor made any questionable remarks during jury selection
holding that, in evaluating a Batson claim alleging gender discrimination, a court may look to whether the prosecutor made any questionable remarks during jury selection
holding that when evaluating a Batson claim alleging gender discrimination, a court may look to whether the prosecutor made any questionable remarks during jury selection
holding that the defendant was not prejudiced by counsel’s representation of a witness prior to when counsel was appointed to represent the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cappy, Castille, Newman, Saylor, Baer, Baldwin, Eakin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

88 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

138 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.