Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Spotz

Citations

  • 47 A.3d 63
  • 616 Pa. 164
  • 2012 WL 2384409
  • 2012 Pa. LEXIS 1412

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding there was no arguable merit to Spotz’s ineffectiveness claim and that “counsel is not ineffective for failing to raise a meritless objection”
  • issue previously litigated is not cognizable under PCRA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baer, Castille, Consideration, Eakin, Files, McCaffery, Melvin, Saylor, Todd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

67 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.