Third Circuit· 4/9/2013

Karim Eley v. Charles Erickson

Citations

712 F.3d 837
2013 WL 1405923
2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 7118

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that Pennsylvania’s test for insufficient evidence “[do]es not contradict Jackson”
holding that Pennsylvania’s test for insufficient evidence “do[es] not contradict Jackson”
holding a Bruton error prejudicial where “the [Commonwealth] ma[de] no argument to the contrary” and the codefendant’s confession “added substantial, perhaps even critical, weight to the Commonwealth’s case” (quotations omitted)
finding a Bruton violation where the non-testifying co-defendant’s confession “implicated exactly three people in the crimes and exactly three defendants appeared at the joint trial”
“The clearly established federal law governing Eley's [insufficient evidence] claim was determined in Jackson.”
“The clearly established federal law governing Eley’s [insufficient evidence] claim was determined in Jackson”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fuentes, Fisher, Cowen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.