Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 12/19/2008

Commonwealth v. Baker

Citations

963 A.2d 495
2008 Pa. Super. 288
2008 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4301
2008 WL 5265198

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that merger of EWOC with aggravated assault was not warranted as all statutory elements of one offense did not coincide with elements of other offense
holding that defendant's mere request for jury charges, even when \renewed\ after jury was instructed, did not preserve his challenge to the instruction for appeal
holding that an appellant does not preserve an objection to a jury instruction where he states a request for a jury instruction but does not object to the instruction the trial court gives
stating that a particular jury instruction is warranted only where there is evidence supporting such an instruction
holding Baker failed to preserve challenge to jury instruction when she did not assert a specific objection or exception to the instruction that was given
stating that a particular jury instruction is warranted only where there is evidence supporting such an instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stevens, Freedberg, Popovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.