Commonwealth v. Galindes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the firing of a weapon constitutes the type of conduct likely to result in serious bodily injury
• concluding that the evidence was sufficient to support firearms convictions, despite the fact that the police never recovered a firearm, where witness testimony indicated that the defendant possessed a firearm
• holding firing a gun at someone is conduct that is likely to result in serious bodily injury and shows intent to injure
• explaining that “[e]ven though [intended victim] was not struck by any bullets, the act of firing a gun toward him constitutes an attempt to cause serious bodily injury” and thus was sufficient to prove aggravated assault
• affirming firearms convictions where the only evidence that a firearm was used during an attempted burglary was the victim’s testimony that he heard gunshots and saw flashes
• finding sufficient evidence of conspiracy - 11 - J-S92026-16 to commit burglary where appellants knocked on front door to determine whether someone was home, took turns kicking back door, and, when discovered, fled and fired shots

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).