Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 8/19/2004
Commonwealth v. Sepulveda
Citations
- 855 A.2d 783
- 579 Pa. 217
- 2004 Pa. LEXIS 1923
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that where the defendant was shot in the abdomen, he was shot in a vital part of his body
- stating that where the defendant was shot in the abdomen, he was shot in a vital part of his body
- stating that when the defendant was shot in the abdomen, he was shot in a vital part of his body
- holding that a defendant was “clearly deprived of his freedom of action when” a police officer “handcuffed him, placed him in the back of the patrol car, and locked the door[,]” such that “he was indeed in custody for Miranda purposes at that time”
- noting that abdomen is a vital part of the human body
- shooting victim in the abdomen amounted to shooting him in a “vital part of the body” and was sufficient to prove appellant's intent to kill
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor, Eakin, Lamb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. SepulvedaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-11-28· cited 299×
- Quinby v. Plumsteadville Family Practice, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-10-18· cited 163×
- Commonwealth v. Sepulveda, M., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-08-15· cited 73×
- Commonwealth v. PageSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-01-07· cited 65×
- Commonwealth v. SzakalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-08-03· cited 38×
- Commonwealth v. GarvinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-05-30· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. SeilhamerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-11-23· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. AustinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-08-21· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. HayesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-05-01· cited 11×
- Commonwealth v. PowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2014-06-06· cited 6×
- Commonwealth v. RolfLancaster County Court of Common Pleas· 2009-04-07
- Commonwealth v. EnckLebanon County Court of Common Pleas· 2010-08-10
- Commonwealth v. HawkinsLehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 2010-09-16
Cites
43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,571×
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1971-02-24· cited 2,903×
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,680×
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 2,603×
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 2,048×
- New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court· 1984-06-12· cited 1,468×
- Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-12-31· cited 1,205×
- Commonwealth v. ZettlemoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-12-30· cited 709×
- Commonwealth v. FreemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-05-30· cited 307×
- Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-11-22· cited 233×
- Commonwealth v. DavenportSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-03-16· cited 232×
- Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-07-20· cited 227×
- People v. CiprianoMichigan Supreme Court· 1988-09-16· cited 209×
- Thompson v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-06-04· cited 206×
- Commonwealth v. BaezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-11-23· cited 170×
- Commonwealth v. HowardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-08-08· cited 157×
- Commonwealth v. RiosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-10-30· cited 141×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.