Commonwealth v. Austin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• given that appellant did not wait for [the victim to brandish his weapon], a jury could possibly conclude that [the victim] had not yet folly demonstrated an intent to shoot appellant, making appellant’s belief that he needed to shoot unreasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Miller
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-01-20· cited 109×
• State Of Iowa Vs. David John Halstead
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2010-12-17· cited 68×
• Commonwealth v. Robinson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-10-31· cited 27×
• Commonwealth v. Cepeda
  Berks County Court of Common Pleas· 2008-10-29
• Rodriguez v. Rozum
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2012-06-13

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. DiFrancesco
  Supreme Court· 1980-12-09· cited 1,657×
• Commonwealth v. Tilley
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-07-18· cited 151×
• Commonwealth v. Goldhammer
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-11-19· cited 148×
• Commonwealth v. Magliocco
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-09-28· cited 108×
• Commonwealth v. Cosnek
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-11-24· cited 89×
• Commonwealth v. D.M.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-05-21· cited 58×
• Commonwealth v. Serge
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-12-03· cited 49×
• Commonwealth v. Sepulveda
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-08-19· cited 37×
• Commonwealth v. Campbell
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-12-28· cited 33×
• Commonwealth v. Smith
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-07-06· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. White
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-01-22· cited 6×