Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Page

Citations

  • 59 A.3d 1118
  • 2013 Pa. Super. 2
  • 2013 WL 57907
  • 2013 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[a] determination of credibility lies solely within the province of the factfinder.”
  • noting that “any conflict in the testimony goes to the credibility of the witnesses and is solely to be resolved by the factfinder”
  • noting that “any conflict in the testimony goes to the credibility of the witnesses and is solely to be resolved by the factfinder”
  • stating that a suppression court’s findings of fact, where supported by the record, are binding on a reviewing court
  • noting that “any conflict in the testimony goes to the credibility of the witnesses and is solely to be resolved by the factfinder”
  • noting that “any conflict in the testimony goes to the credibility of the witnesses and is solely to be resolved by the factfinder”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bender, Donohue, Strassburger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.