Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Rhodes

Citations

  • 54 A.3d 908
  • 2012 Pa. Super. 210
  • 2012 WL 4486226
  • 2012 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2528

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that arguments raised but not developed on appeal are waived
  • finding no Brady violation where appellant failed to use reasonable diligence to uncover contact information and whereabouts of witnesses who had potentially exculpatory information
  • finding an issue to be waived for “bald assertions” without any other relevant analysis
  • defendant waived issue when he failed to “adequately develop [the] argument”
  • failure to adequately evelop argument results in waiver

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Colville, Ott, Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.