Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Cole

Citations

  • 167 A.3d 49
  • 2017 Pa. Super. 211
  • 2017 WL 2889120
  • 2017 Pa. Super. LEXIS 497

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding mistrial was not warranted by prosecutor’s comments because a cautionary instruction was presumably followed
  • noting that “the jury is presumed to have followed the court’s instructions[,]” and that an appellant’s “failure to object to the instruction indicated his satisfaction with the instruction”
  • finding waiver when the appellant failed to identify where in the record an issue was preserved
  • jurors are presumed to follow court’s instructions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bender, Gantman, Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.