Skip to main content

Com. v. Cosby Jr., W.

Citations

  • 224 A.3d 372
  • 2019 Pa. Super. 354

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that appellant failed to develop his challenge to the constitutionality of SORNA II where he cited, but did not adequately apply, the Mendoza-Martinez test to challenged provisions of SORNA II
  • explaining that the circumstances of the crimes need not be identical, but there must be a “logical connection between them.”
  • holding failure to discuss alterations in SORNA II made in response to Muniz and Butler resulted in waiver of claim under Pa.R.A.P. 2119(a
  • holding failure to discuss alterations in SORNA II made in response to Muniz and Butler resulted in waiver of claim under Pa.R.A.P. 2119(a
  • noting that the appellee would be free to cross-examine the other-acts witness on the facts surrounding her allegations and her memory of the incident
  • concluding that prior bad acts evidence “established a distinct, signature pattern[ where the a]ppellant presented himself as a mentor or potential mentor to much younger women in order to establish trust, and then he abused that trust by drugging those women in order to sexually assault them”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bender

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

67 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.