Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 12/10/2019
Com. v. Cosby Jr., W.
Citations
- 224 A.3d 372
- 2019 Pa. Super. 354
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that appellant failed to develop his challenge to the constitutionality of SORNA II where he cited, but did not adequately apply, the Mendoza-Martinez test to challenged provisions of SORNA II
- explaining that the circumstances of the crimes need not be identical, but there must be a “logical connection between them.”
- holding failure to discuss alterations in SORNA II made in response to Muniz and Butler resulted in waiver of claim under Pa.R.A.P. 2119(a
- holding failure to discuss alterations in SORNA II made in response to Muniz and Butler resulted in waiver of claim under Pa.R.A.P. 2119(a
- noting that the appellee would be free to cross-examine the other-acts witness on the facts surrounding her allegations and her memory of the incident
- concluding that prior bad acts evidence “established a distinct, signature pattern[ where the a]ppellant presented himself as a mentor or potential mentor to much younger women in order to establish trust, and then he abused that trust by drugging those women in order to sexually assault them”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bender
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Com. v. Gilliam, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-03-12· cited 91×
- Nelida Cabeda v. Attorney General United StatesThird Circuit· 2020-08-18· cited 25×
- Com. v. Manzano, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-08-21· cited 22×
- Com. v. Martz, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-04-28· cited 4×
- Commonwealth v. Cosby, Jr., W., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-06-30
Cites
67 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2013-06-17· cited 5,868×
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court· 1963-02-18· cited 2,208×
- Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-10-28· cited 1,456×
- Commonwealth v. AntidormiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-01-23· cited 1,004×
- Commonwealth v. Muniz, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-07-19· cited 899×
- Com., Dept. of Transp. v. O'CONNELLSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-03-06· cited 482×
- Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-03-27· cited 428×
- Commonwealth v. BriggsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-01-19· cited 417×
- Commonwealth v. Abu-JamalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-10-29· cited 410×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-09-25· cited 383×
- Commonwealth v. ButlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-10-31· cited 372×
- Commonwealth v. TysonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-06-10· cited 303×
- Commonwealth v. CoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-11-19· cited 290×
- Commonwealth v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-03-25· cited 276×
- Crouse v. Cyclops IndustriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-01-28· cited 270×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-06-30· cited 255×
- Commonwealth v. LaCavaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-09-19· cited 252×
- Commonwealth v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-03-13· cited 237×
- Commonwealth v. BoczkowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-03-23· cited 231×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.