Commonwealth v. Surovcik

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Rule 600 ran from first criminal complaint where Commonwealth’s only reason for dismissing first complaint and refiling was alleged new evidence and that new evidence was merely cumulative of evidence available to the Commonwealth when it dismissed the first complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Peterson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-05-04· cited 73×
• Commonwealth v. Rhodes
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-10-01· cited 35×
• Commonwealth v. Leak
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-03-23· cited 30×
• Commonwealth v. Johnson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-12-07· cited 3×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Martz
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-06-06· cited 97×
• Commonwealth v. Meadius
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-03-29· cited 60×
• Commonwealth v. Mumich
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-03-29· cited 48×
• Commonwealth v. Sires
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-01-30· cited 15×