Commonwealth v. Leak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Appellant listed and discussed the items that were critical to his ability to cross-examine witness
• fact that defendant did not have unavailable witness’s medical records at preliminary hearing did not bar admission of preliminary hearing testimony where those documents did not show inconsistency
• discussing Davis, 786 A.2d at 175

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).