Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 12/8/2006

Commonwealth v. Morgan

Citations

913 A.2d 906

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that instant messages sent to a victim through the internet were “sufficient to affirm Appellant’s conviction for violating 18 Pa.C.S. Section 6318.”
stating that because trial court is in best position to view the evidence presented, an appellate court will give that court “the utmost consideration” when reviewing its weight determination
stating that because the trial court is in best position to view the evidence presented, an appellate court will give that court “the utmost consideration” when reviewing its weight determination
stating that because the trial court is in best position to view the evidence presented, an appellate court will give that court “the utmost consideration” when reviewing its weight determination
stating that because the trial court is in best position to view the evidence presented, an appellate court will give that court “the utmost consideration” when reviewing its weight determination
stating that because the trial court is in best position to view the evidence presented, an appellate court will give that court “the utmost consideration” when reviewing its weight determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowes, Melvin, Tamilia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Commonwealth v. Morgan

62 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.