Commonwealth v. Charlton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court has \long-recognized\ that the uncorroborated testimony of a sexual assault victim is sufficient to convict a defendant
• holding that the uncorroborated testimony of a sexual assault victim, if believed by the finder of fact, is sufficient to convict the defendant
• recognizing that the uncorroborated testimony of a sexual assault victim, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient to convict a defendant
• noting that, in prosecution for, inter alia, corruption of minors, this Court has long held that a victim’s uncorroborated testimony is sufficient to convict
• finding that the uncorroborated testimony of a sexual assault victim, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient to convict a defendant
• explaining that a challenge to the weight of the evidence questions which evidence is to be believed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).