Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Santana

Citations

  • 333 A.2d 876
  • 460 Pa. 482
  • 1975 Pa. LEXIS 679

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding testimony should have been rejected by jury where refuted by “undisputed physical facts”
  • “‘[Testimony in conflict with incontrovertible physical facts and contrary to human experience and the laws of nature must be rejected.’ ” (citation omitted)
  • “‘[T]estimony in conflict with incontrovertible physical facts and contrary to human experience and the laws of nature must be rejected.’” (citation omitted)
  • “It is settled law in Pennsylvania that testimony in conflict with the incontrovertible physical facts and contrary to human experience and the laws of nature must be rejected.”
  • “It is settled law in Pennsylvania that testimony in conflict with the incontrovertible physical facts and contrary to human experience and the laws of nature must be rejected.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.