Skip to main content
· 5/18/2000

Commonwealth v. MacPherson

Citations

  • 752 A.2d 384
  • 561 Pa. 571
  • 2000 Pa. LEXIS 1248

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an accused can introduce evidence to rebut Commonwealth’s inferences concerning his BAC
  • noting that absorption takes up to ninety minutes after consumption
  • summarizing, in terms of overbreadth, the trial court's basis for invalidating a prior DUI statute
  • noting that absorption takes up to ninety minutes after consumption
  • summarizing, in terms of overbreadth, the trial court’s basis for invalidating a prior DUI statute
  • section 3731(a.1) creates “a permissible inference” but “does not shift the burden of proof or the burden of production from the Commonwealth to the defendant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.