· 5/18/2000
Commonwealth v. MacPherson
Citations
- 752 A.2d 384
- 561 Pa. 571
- 2000 Pa. LEXIS 1248
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an accused can introduce evidence to rebut Commonwealth’s inferences concerning his BAC
- noting that absorption takes up to ninety minutes after consumption
- summarizing, in terms of overbreadth, the trial court's basis for invalidating a prior DUI statute
- noting that absorption takes up to ninety minutes after consumption
- summarizing, in terms of overbreadth, the trial court’s basis for invalidating a prior DUI statute
- section 3731(a.1) creates “a permissible inference” but “does not shift the burden of proof or the burden of production from the Commonwealth to the defendant”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.