Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 9/24/2003
Commonwealth v. Mayfield
Citations
- 832 A.2d 418
- 574 Pa. 460
- 882 A.2d 418
- 2003 Pa. LEXIS 1742
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that trial court erroneously found that statute was vague for failing to include a specific mens rea element because section 302(c) supplied the necessary mens rea element
- holding that trial court erroneously found that statute was vague for failing to include a specific mens rea element because section 302(c) supplied the necessary mens rea element
- noting in prosecution for sexual assault that § 302(c) “require[s] the Commonwealth to prove at least recklessness”
- assessing 18 Pa. C.S.A. § 3124.2 – a provision neighboring § 3123(a)(7) – that criminalizes institutional sexual assault and importing a mens rea of recklessness
- “[s]exual contact between correctional staff and inmates is obviously rife with the possibility of coercion, both subtle and overt, given the extensive power guards exercise over inmates” and, accordingly, Lawrence is inapplicable
- we presume “‘the General Assembly does not intend to violate the Constitution of the United States or of this Commonwealth’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor, Eakin, Lamb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. ThurSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-08-04· cited 289×
- Commonwealth v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-11-20· cited 148×
- Commonwealth v. DavidsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-10-14· cited 129×
- Commonwealth v. BullockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-12-27· cited 110×
- Commonwealth v. KinneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-12-03· cited 109×
- Commonwealth v. LudwigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-05-19· cited 94×
- Commonwealth v. HoweSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-01-26· cited 90×
- State v. McKenzie-AdamsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-02-27· cited 90×
- Commonwealth v. MorganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-12-08· cited 78×
- Commonwealth v. KakhankhamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-10-28· cited 64×
- Commonwealth v. SanchezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-04-22· cited 63×
- Commonwealth v. HabaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-10-10· cited 55×
- Commonwealth v. GiordanoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-08-05· cited 54×
- Commonwealth v. EtchisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-01-24· cited 53×
- Commonwealth v. DudaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-05-31· cited 44×
- Commonwealth v. FeeseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-09-18· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. CrawfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-06-13· cited 28×
- Commonwealth v. FultonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-04-09· cited 27×
- Commonwealth v. HermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-05-25· cited 26×
- Singson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2005-11-08· cited 25×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.