Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Harris

Citations

  • 75 Mass. App. Ct. 696
  • 916 N.E.2d 396
  • 2009 Mass. App. LEXIS 1364

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • including among circumstantial evidence that weighed in favor of finding that substance was cocaine the fact that “canine used in the search made a positive hit, which directly led the officers to the cocaine”
  • error harmless beyond a reasonable doubt where, among other evidence, defendant had signed statement admitting substance was cocaine
  • “A substance can be identified as a controlled drug . . . through the testimony of experienced police officers”
  • wherein the defendant’s second statement was motivated by the defendant’s desire to exonerate his cousin
  • defendant signed a statement that the substance was cocaine, an experienced officer weighed the cocaine and testified to its nature, and a police dog made a positive identification
  • passage of two hours and involvement of different police personnel broke sequence of events

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cypher, Milkey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.