Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 12/30/1977
Commonwealth v. White
Citations
- 371 N.E.2d 777
- 374 Mass. 132
- 1977 Mass. LEXIS 1227
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- statement excluded because defendant had not waived his rights and statement could not serve as probable cause for search warrant for defendant’s automobile; held, evidence from car must be suppressed
- fruit of a violation of Miranda rules must be suppressed
- fruit of a violation of Miranda rules must be suppressed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Braucher, Hennessey, Kaplan, Liacos, Quirico
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
89 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court· 1985-03-04· cited 2,824×
- Commonwealth v. TavaresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1982-01-29· cited 315×
- Commonwealth v. MatchettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1982-06-14· cited 157×
- Commonwealth v. GarciaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1980-01-08· cited 150×
- Commonwealth v. MeehanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1979-03-19· cited 148×
- Commonwealth v. RaymondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1997-03-07· cited 144×
- State v. PatinoSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1980-05-19· cited 138×
- Commonwealth v. WatkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1978-06-20· cited 126×
- Commonwealth v. WilborneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1981-01-07· cited 113×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1979-06-11· cited 110×
- Larry Winsett v. Odie Washington, Warden of Dixon Correctional CenterSeventh Circuit· 1997-11-18· cited 108×
- Mallott v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1980-02-22· cited 104×
- Derrington v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-02-21· cited 104×
- Osban v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-09-17· cited 95×
- Commonwealth v. GilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1984-11-06· cited 87×
- Commonwealth v. DayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1983-01-11· cited 86×
- Commonwealth v. MottaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1997-01-15· cited 78×
- Commonwealth v. BenoitMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1981-01-06· cited 76×
- United States v. John Theodore DowningFirst Circuit· 1981-12-04· cited 72×
- Commonwealth v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1979-02-15· cited 72×
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 6,512×
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court· 1970-10-12· cited 4,391×
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 3,445×
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1977-05-16· cited 2,626×
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court· 1977-06-21· cited 2,561×
- Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 2,465×
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1920-03-01· cited 2,373×
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1939-12-11· cited 1,927×
- Michigan v. TuckerSupreme Court· 1974-06-10· cited 1,437×
- United States v. EdwardsSupreme Court· 1974-03-26· cited 917×
- Aetna Insurance v. Kennedy Ex Rel. BogashSupreme Court· 1937-05-17· cited 531×
- Commonwealth v. HaasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1977-11-01· cited 209×
- Commonwealth v. AlmeidaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1977-08-29· cited 130×
- Commonwealth v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1975-02-10· cited 126×
- Commonwealth v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1972-10-27· cited 102×
- Commonwealth v. HoseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1975-09-09· cited 88×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.