Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 7/7/2005

Commonwealth v. Little

Citations

879 A.2d 293
2005 Pa. Super. 251
2005 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2219

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that the evidence was sufficient to support appellant’s PWID conviction where police found numerous bags of cocaine and marijuana, a digital scale, a bottle of Inositol, and a number of plastic bags in appellant’s home
permitting premature appeal of petition for reconsideration when order denying petition was entered between filing of notice of appeal and consideration by appellate court
refusing to consider a claim because the relevant transcript was not part of the record
permitting premature appeal of petition for reconsideration when order denying petition was entered between filing of notice of appeal and consideration by appellate court
noting that it is an appellant’s duty to “ensure that the certified record is complete for purposes of review” and “[a]n - 11 - J-S08035-25 appellant’s failure to provide the reviewing court with a complete certified record results in the waiver of the claim”
Superior Court would entertain appeal that was filed prematurely when petition for reconsideration was still pending because order denying reconsideration was subsequently entered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gantman, Olszewski, Panella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.