Commonwealth v. Dehart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that judgment became final when period for filing petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court lapsed
• it is appellant’s duty to “ensure that the certified record is complete for purposes of review”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Karanicolas
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-11-12· cited 257×
• Commonwealth v. McKeever
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-04-21· cited 200×
• Commonwealth v. Little
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-07-07· cited 82×
• Commonwealth v. Wall
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-07-10· cited 50×
• Commonwealth v. Padden
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-08-23· cited 47×
• Commonwealth v. Priovolos
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-01-27· cited 40×
• Com. v. PRIVOLOS
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-01-27
• Com. v. Cruz, J.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2026-03-12
• Com. v. Thomas, L.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2026-04-17

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. DeHart
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-10-03· cited 145×
• Commonwealth v. Alcorn
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-12-17· cited 132×
• Commonwealth v. DeHart
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-11-22· cited 63×
• Commonwealth v. Lewis
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-10-02· cited 42×
• Cade v. McDanel
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-06-12· cited 24×
• Commonwealth v. Carbone
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-01-12· cited 21×