Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 12/8/1998

Commonwealth v. Miller

Citations

  • 721 A.2d 1121
  • 1998 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3896

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that this Court may not act as counsel for an appellant and develop arguments on his or her behalf
  • explaining “[w]hen issues are not properly raised and developed in briefs. . . a court will not consider the merits thereof.”
  • explaining “[w]hen issues are not properly raised and developed in briefs... a court will not consider the merits thereof.”
  • explaining “[w]hen issues are not properly raised and developed in briefs. . . a court will not consider the merits thereof.”
  • finding claim waived where there was a “lack of factual background and citation to the record, coupled with the anemic state of the argument portion of Appellant’s brief[]”
  • finding claims waived where there was a “lack of factual background and citation to the record, coupled with the anemic state of the argument portion of [Miller’s appellate] brief”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Stevens, Hester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.