Commonwealth v. McCall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the “overt act need not be committed by the defendant; it need only be committed by a co-conspirator”
• evidence sufficient for 9 conspiracy to commit PWID where the appellant served as a lookout and held money for his cohort, even where he did not hold drugs
• evidence sufficient to sustain possession with intent to deliver and conspiracy convictions where the defendant stood watch during drug -5- J-A11001-16 transactions and received proceeds even though the defendant never handled drugs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).