Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Whitman

Citations

  • 880 A.2d 1250
  • 2005 Pa. Super. 277
  • 2005 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2525

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that an aggregate sentence of thirty-nine to seventy-eight years of imprisonment for numerous burglaries but no violent crimes was “unwarranted and unfair,” “the sentence is virtually a life sentence and is grossly disparate to sentences imposed on similar offenders”
  • stating that a claim that one’s sentence is excessive is a challenge to the discretionary aspects of the sentence
  • stating that a claim that one’s sentence is excessive is a challenge to the discretionary aspects of the sentence
  • “While sentencing courts do possess broad discretion, that discretion is not unfettered and remains subject to appellate review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Klein, Bowes, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.