Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Torres

Citations

  • 617 A.2d 812
  • 421 Pa. Super. 233
  • 1992 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4269

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that evidence of individually wrapped bags of cocaine and the lack of paraphernalia for personal use of crack cocaine gave rise to an inference of intent to deliver
  • absence -7- J-S41044-16 of paraphernalia for consumption of cocaine provides inference of intent to deliver
  • evidence of individually wrapped bags of cocaine gave inference of intent to deliver
  • absence of paraphernalia for consumption of cocaine gave inference of intent to deliver
  • this court found sufficient evidence to affirm appellee’s conviction of intent to deliver where appellee’s vehicle contained 4.63 grams of cocaine wrapped in 17 packets, boxes of sandwich bags, $236.00 in cash, and expert testimony indicating an intent to deliver
  • “In . . . Smagala and [Commonwealth v.] Gill, [415 A.2d 2 (Pa. 1980)], unlike the instant case, the appellants possessed use paraphernalia, which indicated an intent to consume rather than distribute the controlled substances involved.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wieand, Elliott, Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.