Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Jacobs

Citations

  • 39 A.3d 977
  • 614 Pa. 664
  • 2012 WL 716875
  • 2012 Pa. LEXIS 356

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding sentences for attempt to escape and conspiracy to commit escape from prison did not merge under section 906, where conspiracy conviction based on joint escape plan, while attempt to escape conviction involved several distinct escape attempts
  • accepting “review to determine whether [a]ppellant’s sentences for … two inchoate crimes are illegal under 18 Pa.C.S. § 906”
  • considering the Commonwealth’s closing arguments in concluding that the jury’s verdict was not ambiguous
  • where record established each inchoate crime (attempted escape and conspiracy to commit escape) had separate criminal purpose, sentence did not violate section 906

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baer, Castille, Eakin, McCAFFERY, Melvin, Orie, Saylor, Todd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.