Commonwealth v. Grekis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A]ppellant’s dominion and control over the goods may be exercised through another, . . . .”
• “[T]here is no requirement that appellant actually physically have handled the stolen goods in order to have possessed them for purposes of this offense.”
• Commonwealth can show the “receiving” element of receiving stolen property offense by constructive possession

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).