Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 8/15/2016

Commonwealth, Aplt v. Kingston, S.

Citations

  • 143 A.3d 917
  • 636 Pa. 438
  • 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1765
  • 2016 WL 4273574

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that when a solicitation evolves into a conspiracy, the defendant can be punished for only one
  • consulting other provisions of the Crimes Code9 for context and viewing the statute “as a whole” in interpreting unambiguous text
  • citing, inter imprisoned for one year, one month, and nineteen days in excess of that of an individual similarly situated who was able to post bail. Such a disparity can have no conceivable penological justification. There are two purposes for awarding pre-sentence credits: (1
  • “A statute’s plain language generally provides the best indication of legislative intent.” (internal citation omitted)
  • “A statute’s plain language generally provides the best indication of legislative intent.” (internal citation omitted)
  • “A statute’s plain language generally provides the best indication of legislative intent.” (internal citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Saylor, Baer, Todd, Donohue, Dougherty, Wecht, Mundy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Commonwealth, Aplt v. Kingston, S.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.