Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 12/28/2007

Commonwealth v. Gordon

Citations

942 A.2d 174
596 Pa. 231
2007 Pa. LEXIS 2938

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that “logical and temporal relationship between the predicate crimes’’ is not fact-finding
“It seems to be a settled question in Pennsylvania that Apprendi-based challenges raise questions related to the legality of a sentence[.]”
“It seems to be a settled question in Pennsylvania that Apprendi-b&sed challenges raise questions related to the legality of a sentence!.]”
“Pennsylvania judges retain broad discretion to sentence up to and including the maximum sentence authorized by statute; the only line that a sentence may not cross is the statutory maximum sentence.”
“Pennsylvania judges retain broad discretion to sentence up to and including the maximum sentence authorized by statute; the only line that a sentence may not cross is the statutory maximum sentence.”
under Garland , lack of arraignment or plea did not deprive defendant of due process, where defendant was aware of charges against him throughout proceedings and vigorously litigated every aspect of case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cappy, Castille, Saylor, Eakin, Baer, Baldwin, Fitzgerald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.