Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Maguire

Citations

  • 452 A.2d 1047
  • 307 Pa. Super. 80
  • 1982 Pa. Super. LEXIS 5762

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing a trial court may not sentence a defendant on two inchoate crime convictions
  • rejecting the defendant's argument that “convicted” in Section 906 is equivalent to the jury's verdict: “When the law speaks of a ‘conviction,’ it means a judgment, and not merely a verdict, which in common parlance is called a ‘conviction.’”
  • rejecting the defendant's argument that “convicted” in Section 906 is equivalent to the jury's verdict: “When the law speaks of a ‘conviction,’ it means a judgment, and not merely a verdict, which in common parlance is called a ‘conviction.’”
  • rejecting the defendant's argument that “convicted” in Section 906 is equivalent to the jury's verdict: “When the law speaks of a ‘conviction,’ it means a judgment, and not merely a verdict, which in common parlance is called a ‘conviction.’ ”
  • “[W]here the trial court has erroneously convicted and sentenced an appellant for two inchoate crimes, [one] remedy [is] to remand for resentencing for either one or the other.”
  • \Sentencing Code contains no provision for a `suspended' sentence.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spaeth, Cavanaugh, Montemuro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.