Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1/15/1991

Commonwealth v. Rodriguez

Citations

585 A.2d 988
526 Pa. 268
1991 Pa. LEXIS 19

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

exigent circumstances exist where police did not have advance notice that defendant and her husband would be traveling in York County in particular automobile
exigent circumstances exist where police did not have advance notice that defendant and her husband would be traveling in York County in particular automobile
exigent circumstances exist where police did not have ad vanee notice that defendant and her husband would be traveling in York County in particular automobile
exigent circumstances exist where police did not have advance notice that defendant and her husband would be traveling in York County in particular automobile
although tips received November 15 and 23, car encountered on November 27 was pulling away from the delivery location
in the “interest of judicial economy,” Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled upon ineffectiveness claim absent determination by lower courts because record was adequate to permit resolution of the issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cappy, Flaherty, Larsen, McDEROTT, Nix, Papadakos, Zappala

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

66 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.