Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2/16/2010

Commonwealth v. Jones

Citations

988 A.2d 649
605 Pa. 188
2010 Pa. LEXIS 157

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that where the suppression court’s factual findings are supported by the record, appellate courts are bound by those findings
defining “probable cause” as a common-sense determination of “fair probability” evidence would be found in a particular place
defining “probable cause” as a common-sense determination of “fair probability” evidence would be found in a particular place
indicating a reviewing court must determine whether the issuing magistrate had a substantial basis for concluding probable cause existed and is not to conduct a de novo review of the issuing authority's probable cause determination
outlining the standard of appellate review of orders denying motions to suppress
judge erred in concluding it was unnecessary for police to obtain further information concerning identity of victim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Castille, Saylor, Eakin, Baer, Todd, McCaffery, Greenspan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

92 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.