Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Flowers

Citations

  • 149 A.3d 867
  • 2016 Pa. Super. 230
  • 2016 Pa. Super. LEXIS 611
  • 2016 WL 6157509

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a claim that the trial court failed to set forth adequate reasons for the sentence imposed raises a substantial question
  • noting that an appellant raises “a substantial question for our review by asserting that the trial court failed to state adequate reasons on the record for [an a]ppellant’s sentence.”
  • stating that “it is not sufficient for the trial court to state its reasons in a post-sentence Rule 1925(a) opinion.”
  • stating that a “claim that sentencing court failed to state adequate reasons for sentence imposed presents substantial question regarding appropriateness of sentence” (citation omitted)
  • stating that an argument that the trial court failed to state adequate reasons on the record for its sentence raises a substantial question
  • finding that a misstatement of the time period for filing an appeal constituted a breakdown in the operation of the court which excused late filing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stabile, Solano, Fitzgerald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.