Commonwealth v. Parlante

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that failing to adequately state reasons on the record coupled with failure to consider rehabilitative needs raises a substantial question
• holding that an appellant whose revocation of probation sentence has been imposed after a revocation proceeding has thirty days to appeal the sentence, regardless of whether a post-sentence motion has been filed
• holding allegations that court imposed disproportionate sentence and did not consider proper sentencing factors raised substantial question
• holding allegations that court imposed disproportionate sentence and did not consider proper sentencing factors raised substantial question
• holding allegations that court imposed disproportionate sentence and did not consider proper sentencing factors raised substantial question
• holding trial court's misstatement of appeal period in order denying post- sentence motion operated as breakdown in court's operation, which justified review of facially untimely appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).