Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 4/10/2015

Commonwealth v. Flowers

Citations

113 A.3d 1246

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “this Court must conduct an independent review of the record to discern if there are any additional, non-frivolous issues overlooked by counsel”
holding that “this Court must conduct an independent review of the record to discern if there are any additional, non- frivolous issues overlooked by counsel”
holding that “this Court must conduct an independent review of the record to discern if there are any additional, non-frivolous issues overlooked by counsel.”
holding that we must “conduct an independent review of the record to discern if there are any additional, non-frivolous issues overlooked by counsel”
holding that without the notes of testimony from the guilty plea proceedings as part of the record, counsel could not have fulfilled his duty to review the entire record for any non-frivolous issues
holding that, after determining counsel has satisfied the technical requirements of Anders and Santiago, this Court must conduct an independent review of the record to determine if there are additional, non- -9- J-S84008-17 frivolous issues overlooked by counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bender, Donohue, Strassburger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Commonwealth v. Flowers

14 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.