Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 7/9/1993

Commonwealth v. Hill

Citations

629 A.2d 949
427 Pa. Super. 440
1993 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2256

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“Simply put, the sentencing judge must state his or her reasons for the sentence imposed”
“Simply put, the sentencing judge must state his or her reasons for the sentence imposed”
“Simply put, the sentencing judge must state his or her reasons for the sentence imposed”
“Malice may be inferred from the intentional use of a deadly weapon on a vital part of the body.”
where a 205-pound victim grabbed a 130-pound defendant by the collar after threatening to beat him up, use of deadly force still was not reasonable
“Simply put, the sentencing judge must state his or her reasons for the sentence imposed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rowley, Cirillo, Olszewski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.