Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2/28/2023

Com. v. Goodco Mechanical, Inc.

Citations

291 A.3d 378
2023 Pa. Super. 32

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that a defendant may challenge the discretionary aspects of a sentence when the defendant enters an open guilty plea
holding the appellant waived claim on appeal that the PSI was inadequate or deficient since he did not object to the admission of the PSI in the trial court
“all courts of common pleas have statewide subject matter jurisdiction in cases arising under the Crimes Code”
“the claim that the sentence was the result of bias and prejudice, and not individualized, also constitutes a substantial question”
“[A] claim of excessiveness, in conjunction with a - 12 - J-S25010-25 claim that the court did not consider the relevant sentencing criteria and/or considered improper factors, poses a substantial question.”
“Under [Section] 9721, the court has discretion to impose sentences consecutively or concurrently[.]” (quoting Commonwealth v. Moury, 992 A.2d 162, 171 (Pa. Super. 2010)). “The unambiguous language of [18 Pa.C.S.A. §] 1321(a)[ (renumbered as the identical Section 9721(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McLaughlin, J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.