Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Harper

Citations

  • 890 A.2d 1078
  • 2006 Pa. Super. 3
  • 2006 Pa. Super. LEXIS 9

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “courts simply will not countenance fraud, and when a decision is obtained through its use, the court retains the inherent power to rescind that decision”
  • relying on the trial court’s representation of testimony where a transcript was missing from the certified record on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Todd, Bowes, Tamilia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.