Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Santiago

Citations

  • 978 A.2d 349
  • 602 Pa. 159
  • 2009 Pa. LEXIS 1784

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “a discussion of counsel’s reasons for believing that the client’s appeal is frivolous is mandatory and must be included in counsel’s brief”
  • holding that “[w]ithout one or the other, we are not assured, as Anders requires, that counsel fully performed his duty as Santiago's advocate[.]”
  • holding that “a discussion of counsel’s reasons for believing that the client’s appeal is frivolous is mandatory and must be included in counsel’s brief”
  • holding that, in the Anders brief, “[c]ounsel should articulate the relevant facts of record, controlling case law, and/or statutes on point that have led to the conclusion that the appeal is frivolous.”
  • providing that “[u]nder Anders, the right to counsel is vindicated by counsel’s examination and assessment of the record” for issues other than those identified by the appellant
  • holding that counsel must now state reasons for concluding that the appeal is frivolous and that counsel need not argue in support of a defendant’s claim, but only refer to potentially supporting portions of the record.[

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Castille, Saylor, Eakin, Baer, Todd, McCaffery, Greenspan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

65 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Commonwealth v. Santiago

68 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.