Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Flowers

Citations

  • 387 A.2d 1268
  • 479 Pa. 153
  • 1978 Pa. LEXIS 659

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that “a test of partnership or concert of action to determine guilt as an accessory” is the proper analysis for accomplice liability rather than a “but-for” test
  • evidence was insufficient to convict a defendant who introduced undercover police officer to drug seller and was present at the sale of $200 worth of marijuana
  • defendant, who introduced undercover agent to drug seller only after agent requested drugs, and who did not actively participate in the actual subsequent transaction, was not an accessory before the fact for sale of marijuana
  • mere presence during commission of a crime does not constitute aiding and abetting

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino, Packel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.