Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 6/14/2017
Commonwealth v. Schmidt
Citations
- 165 A.3d 1002
- 2017 Pa. Super. 186
- 2017 WL 2569942
- 2017 Pa. Super. LEXIS 433
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “After determining that counsel has satisfied the[] technical requirements of Anders and Santiago, this Court must then conduct an independent review of the record to discern if there are any additional, non-frivolous issues overlooked by counsel.”
- “After determining that counsel has satisfied the[] technical requirements of Anders and Santiago, this Court must then conduct an independent review of the record to discern if there are any additional, non-frivolous issues overlooked by counsel.”
- “After determining that counsel has satisfied the[ ] technical requirements of Anders and Santiago, this Court must then conduct an independent review of the record to discern if there are any additional, non-frivolous issues overlooked by counsel.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bender, Gantman, Stevens
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court· 1983-07-05· cited 7,925×
- Commonwealth v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-08-25· cited 1,639×
- Commonwealth v. GoodwinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-06-13· cited 776×
- Commonwealth v. McClendonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-09-24· cited 771×
- Commonwealth v. FlowersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-04-10· cited 617×
- United States v. James R. WagnerSeventh Circuit· 1996-12-26· cited 527×
- Commonwealth v. NischanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-07-05· cited 516×
- Commonwealth v. OrellanaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-02-24· cited 508×
- Commonwealth v. ShugarsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-03-24· cited 480×
- State v. CauseySupreme Court of Florida· 1987-02-26· cited 441×
- Commonwealth v. WrightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-03-26· cited 227×
- Commonwealth v. GarangSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-11-18· cited 189×
- Commonwealth v. HardenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-10-27· cited 162×
- Commonwealth v. MartuscelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-10-04· cited 159×
- Commonwealth v. PalmSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-07-17· cited 157×
- Commonwealth v. FergusonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-10-19· cited 134×
- Commonwealth v. WimbushSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-06-05· cited 131×
- Commonwealth v. WashingtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-03-12· cited 129×
- In re S.M.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-08-23· cited 119×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.