Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 5/23/2008
Commonwealth v. Flowers
Citations
- 950 A.2d 330
- 2008 Pa. Super. 109
- 2008 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1010
- 2008 WL 2152739
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ruling that claim that revocation court failed to order a new PSI or state reasons why one was unnecessary raised a substantial question
- holding that an allegation that the trial court imposed a sentence without considering the requisite statutory factors or stating adequate reasons for dispensing with a pre-sentence report raises a substantial question
- holding that an appellant’s allegation that the trial court imposed sentence “without considering the requisite statutory factors or stating adequate reasons for dispensing with a pre-sentence report” raised a substantial question.
- concluding that the claim that the sentencing court imposed the sentence without considering the statutory factors or stating adequate reasons on the record for dispensing with a PSI was a substantial question
- explaining that a psychological or psychiatric evaluation is optional and the trial court need only request a psychological or psychiatric report \if desirable\
- explaining that a psychiatric evaluation is optional and constitutes only one distinct component of a pre-sentence investigation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bender, Bowes, Tamilia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. CartretteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-12-24· cited 1,101×
- Commonwealth v. VenturaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-05-26· cited 584×
- Commonwealth v. Carrillo-DiazSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-04-09· cited 169×
- Commonwealth v. LuketicSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-05-16· cited 146×
- Commonwealth v. SimmonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-11-30· cited 128×
- Commonwealth v. FinnecySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-02-18· cited 103×
- Commonwealth v. BestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-07-16· cited 102×
- Commonwealth v. KellySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-12-02· cited 98×
- Commonwealth v. TejadaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-04-26· cited 66×
- Com. v. Henck, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2025-07-24
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. GogginsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-03-09· cited 383×
- Commonwealth v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-01-29· cited 246×
- Commonwealth v. HochSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-10-23· cited 180×
- Commonwealth v. FiasckiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-10-24· cited 56×
- Commonwealth v. MonahanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-10-01· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. CarterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-12-12· cited 23×
- Commonwealth v. OusleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-04-18· cited 23×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.