Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Flowers

Citations

  • 950 A.2d 330
  • 2008 Pa. Super. 109
  • 2008 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1010
  • 2008 WL 2152739

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that claim that revocation court failed to order a new PSI or state reasons why one was unnecessary raised a substantial question
  • holding that an allegation that the trial court imposed a sentence without considering the requisite statutory factors or stating adequate reasons for dispensing with a pre-sentence report raises a substantial question
  • holding that an appellant’s allegation that the trial court imposed sentence “without considering the requisite statutory factors or stating adequate reasons for dispensing with a pre-sentence report” raised a substantial question.
  • concluding that the claim that the sentencing court imposed the sentence without considering the statutory factors or stating adequate reasons on the record for dispensing with a PSI was a substantial question
  • explaining that a psychological or psychiatric evaluation is optional and the trial court need only request a psychological or psychiatric report \if desirable\
  • explaining that a psychiatric evaluation is optional and constitutes only one distinct component of a pre-sentence investigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bender, Bowes, Tamilia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.